Concerning the probability that Anthra-Andromda is an Extraterrestrial
This paper is to address the probability that Anthra is an actual
Extraterrestrial. The research contained here is a combination of real physical
data combined with data recorded in the Human collective consciousness. I will show
that the combination of this data results in a virtual 100% probability that
Anthra is Extraterrestrial in origin.
|
STR Locus
|
Alleles Called
|
|
D3S1358
|
14
|
|
18
|
|
TH01
|
|
7
|
|
|
D21S11
|
28
|
|
30
|
|
D18S51
|
17
|
|
22
|
|
Penta E
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
D5S818
|
|
12
|
|
|
D13S317
|
8
|
|
11
|
|
D7S820
|
|
11
|
|
|
D16S539
|
|
12
|
|
|
CSF1PO
|
10
|
|
12
|
|
Penta D
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
Amelogenin
|
Male (XY)
|
|
vWA
|
|
18
|
|
|
D8S1179
|
12
|
|
14
|
|
TPOX
|
9
|
|
11
|
|
FGA
|
20
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Autosomal DNA
Autosomal DNA such as is used by global law enforcement is also useful in
indentifying individuals. This data can also be matched to specific Human
populations.
It seems probable that a mismatch in this data to an individual, and their
respective population, may indicate that such an individual may not be Human at
all, but rather a close analog. Most of Terrestrial biological research is done
strictly on Terrestrial biological systems, never on Extraterrestrial systems
(such extraterrestrial biological are rare or nonexistent on Earth, and those
that do exist are very incomplete).
To the right are the results of an Autosomal DNA panel as provided by an
accredited laboratory. These data show what seems to be "typical" Human DNA.
However, it should be remembered that all of Earth's Primates are very closely
related, and that the common Chimpanzee's DNA is 96% identical to that of
Humans. All of the markers shown here also appear in these Great Apes.
The markers represent a person who is most likely of South
Asian (India) and African (Black) decent, which, in and of itself is not too
unlikely. However, Anthra's phenotype is very European in nature (Light skin,
light hair, Hazel eyes, typical Anglo-Saxon). [These results were obtained using
a software that matched DNA markers to known Human populations].
Some have argued that this may not be so unusual; however, upon searching the
European Forensic database, the markers do not match any European population
(probability of match aprox. 5.00E-13 [0.0000000000005] 1:50,000,000,000,000),
thus making these results rather anomalous.
|
Y - STR Markers
|
|
DYS456
|
16
|
|
DYS389I
|
13
|
|
DYS390
|
24
|
|
DYS389II
|
31
|
|
DYS458
|
17
|
|
DYS19
|
14
|
|
DYS385
|
11, 14
|
|
DYS393
|
13
|
|
DYS391
|
11
|
|
DYS439
|
12
|
|
DYS635
|
23
|
|
DYS392
|
13
|
|
YGATAH4
|
12
|
|
DYS437
|
15
|
|
DYS438
|
12
|
|
DYS448
|
19
|
2. Y Chromosome DNA
A DNA Ancestry laboratory was used to return 16 data points from Y Chromosome
testing. Y Chromosomes are passed through the paternal line and has a fairly
high rate of mutation. While this DNA is passed from father to son unchanged, it
does mutate every 500 generations (aprox. 12,500 years), at this rate it seems
unlikely that Anthra's Y Chromosome is a mutation of his father's.
The testing laboratory reported that the Haplogroup for Anthra was "R1b", yet,
checking with a large Y chromosome database (yhrd.org), no matches can be found,
and, any near matches are "A", and "BF" haplogroups (indigenous to Africa). Not
even a close match to R1b, further, the R1b haplogroup is most common in Europe,
and as we have already seen, there are no links to European populations.
A match can coerced from this data by reducing the number of data point to eight
(8), however this is not a good practice in data analysis. With the full 16 data
points there are no matches in the database. Sixteen (16) points is the minimum
for this company, and 64 points is considered large. If we extrapolate the
matches at 64 data points we can confidently say that there is little chance of
a match to any Human population.
The Y Chromosome database found no matches in 24,409 Haplotypes (150
populations), and only six (6) "neighbor" haplotypes.
3. Human Collective Consciousness
The collective consciousness of any species can be represented by its collective
writings. Thus everything ever published by the Human species is such a
representation. While the Internet is only a subset of these publications, it
can serve as an acceptable replacement, so too can virtually any body of
published text of sufficient size (there necessarily must be limits on the
minimum size of a body of text). This text then may become searchable and
contain additional data concerning virtually any idea. This additional data may
be openly stated within the text, or it may be encoded in a variety of ways.
One such method of encoding data is ELS (equidistant letter spacing), the ELS
method has been brought to light in recent years by proponents of the so-called
"Bible Codes". However, unlike the claims of the proponents, there is no
supernatural hand at play, the data and its encoding is a natural phenomenon and
will occur in any body of text.
It should be noted that this kind of data is not well suited to the predictive
process, but, is well suited to data confirmation and corroboration. The typical
method used is to select a number of key words. Enough keys to both uniquely
identify the data fragment, and to insure a lack of random occurrence. The
result of an ELS search yields a "matrix" or table of letters from the text. The
proximity, quantity, and sometimes the reuse of letters is evaluated, the more
keys, in close proximity validates the data. Reuse of letters by multiple keys
provides greater validation. Each of these tables has a statistical probability
that may be calculated which can be used to further validate the data.
Presented here is the most significant of such ELS's taken from the King James
New Testament (for convenience) that tend to validate the central idea that
Anthra is an extraterrestrial. There are other supporting tables, all with
greater probability of occurrence, and while they can contribute significantly
to the outcome of any statistical analysis, they are omitted here.

This table contains some 26 search terms (keywords) most of which are well
contained in the central portion of the table. Also of note; several of these
terms are crossing each other and some share letters. The terms selected for
this includes items that should be unique to a single individual; Anthra. These
terms include his Terrestrial name, ET name, the name and species of his pet, as
well as the approximate location of his residence.
The probability of this table occurring is: 2.04644463672467E-11.
4. Summery.
As we have seen, we have three (3) data objects that perhaps shouldn't be.
In the first; autosomal DNA that points to a genotype / phenotype that shouldn't
exist given the actual phenotype of Anthra. It is also lacking in DNA
populations that could explain Anthra's phenotype.
In the second we see conflicting reports of Y Chromosome haplogroup. While one
group attempts to attribute it to one haplogroup, another attributes it to none,
with the closest matches marginally confirming estimations from the autosomal
panel (African).
In the third case we are shown that there is a sort of confirmation of the
general idea within the Human collective consciousness. And, done so in a way
that should not exist.
If we use the simplest of math we can see some, perhaps, surprising results. In
the first estimation of Anthra being Extraterrestrial it was inferred that he
was extraterrestrial (actual value was 99.99999%). To arrive at this value a
starting point of 7.00E-15 (0.000000000000007) was used as the probability that
Anthra was extraterrestrial. Approximately one chance in the population of
1,000,000 Earths.
Using simple math we can arrive at a probability that Anthra is Human. By
multiplying the values together we arrive at: 1.5E-29
(0.000000000000000000000000000015), not a very good chance. If we compare it to
the original 7.00E-15 we find that there is approximately a 2.14E13
(21,400,000,000,000 / 21.4 trillion) times greater probability that Anthra is an
extraterrestrial. Or if you prefer to leave out the Collective consciousness
data: 1.07E2. A 107 times greater probability that Anthra is extraterrestrial
than he is Human.
Is this conclusive? You decide, but remember, there is a far greater probability
that Anthra is extraterrestrial than there is for him being a terrestrial Human.